stichting shirati logo horizontaal

sUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT AID IN RURAL TANZANIA

Stichting Shirati is a Dutch non-profit helping Shirati KMT Hospital deliver the best possible care to 354,490 people in Tanzania's Rorya district.

MEDICAL RESEARCH

Scientific analysis of all our projects.

global health

Access to medicine and medical equipment for everyone.

Training

Focused on patient education and training local Tanzanian colleagues.

News

About us

Shirati KMT Hospital

Shirati ‘Kanisa la Mennonite Tanzania’ Hospital was founded in 1934 by American Mennonites. Located on the shores of Lake Victoria, this mission hospital serves 354,490 people in the Rorya district.

Since 2010, the hospital has been led by Bwire Chirangi, a Tanzanian physician who completed his Master’s in Global Health at Maastricht University. Under his leadership, major improvements have been made:

  • Solar panels installed, putting an end to power cuts.
  • A solar-powered water pump drawing from Lake Victoria, bringing clean drinking water throughout the hospital.
  • A hospital-wide electronic patient record system.

History

As international health physicians, we have worked at Shirati for years. Delivering daily care to patients, we noticed certain conditions — malnutrition, road accidents — were occurring at an alarming rate.

Supported by friends and family, we started working toward structural improvement: a peanut production unit was built, skin graft equipment was provided, and local doctors were trained. An outreach programme was launched to distribute schistosomiasis medication to high-risk groups in the region.

To sustain this work long-term, we formalised our efforts in April 2022 by founding Stichting Shirati — giving Shirati a face in the Netherlands and offering donors the tax benefits of an ANBI-registered foundation.

our Projects

This is where your donations go.

Bonesetter Project

Working with traditional bonesetters to create treatment plans for patients with fractures.

Healthy Hearts Project

Identifying patients with cardiovascular disease before they become seriously ill.

Schistosomiasis outreach Shirati

Free treatment and patient education on schistosomiasis.

Shirati Peanut project

Local production of therapeutic peanut paste to combat malnutrition.

Shirati Food Program

One free, nutritious meal every day for all patients.

the team

Jovine Okoth

Researcher
Bonesetter Project

Nkaina Walter

Researcher
Bonesetter Project
Projectmanager
Schistosomiasis Outreach Shirati

Winnie Walter

Projectmanager
Healthy Hearts Project

Suzana Charles

Production assistent
Shirati Peanut Project

Joseph Kimba

Production assistent
Shirati Peanut Project

Thobias Paschal

Treasurer

Nathan Beijneveld

Chairman
Initiator Shirati Peanut Project & Shirati Food Program

Joost Binnerts

Secretary
Initiator Bonesetter Project

Victoria von Salmuth

General board member
Initiator Shirati Peanut Project & Shirati Food Program

Myrthe datema

General board member
Projectmanager Healthy Hearts Project & fundraising

Sophie van Eck - algemeen bestuurslid marketing en communicatie

Sophie van Eck

General board member
Marketing & communicatie

Our partners

Donate

Your donation goes directly to the people who need it most. Choose how you want to help: give once, or make a monthly commitment that keeps our projects running all year. To support a specific project, email us after donating: info@stichtingshirati.nl For other amounts, set up a bank transfer to NL07 TRIO 0320 4851 96 in the name of Stichting Shirati.

Every contribution goes directly to our projects: no overhead, no detours. Give once, or support us monthly for just €10. You choose. 

ANBI REGISTERED

Stichting Shirati is an ANBI-registered foundation. This means periodic donations of 5 years or more are fully tax-deductible in the Netherlands. Fill in our periodic gift agreement and email it to info@stichtingshirati.nl. We’ll take care of the rest.

Publicaties

J.J. Binnerts, T.C.C. Hendriks, M.J. Meijer, J. Okoth, N.W. Harun, P.S. Teyha, G. Njambilo, I.L. Akaro, B.R. Mkinze, E. Staal, M. Botman, N. Bempong-Ahun, G. Ibbotson, W. Harrison, C. Martin Jr., E. Hermans, M.J.R. Edwards & B.M. Chirangi. https://doi.org/10.1002/wjs.12503 

Abstract

Background

High trauma rates and limited orthopaedic care services in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) have led to reliance on traditional bonesetters (TBSs). Previous studies have set up formal training for TBSs to promote integration in the primary healthcare sector. However, the hierarchic structure of these initiatives poses the risk of alienating TBSs instead. Therefore, this study piloted a novel training strategy, by assessing the feasibility of an orthopaedic trauma course, involving bilateral knowledge exchange between both formal healthcare workers (FHWs) and TBSs.

Methods

In November 2024, TBSs and FHWs from Rorya district, rural Tanzania, attended a three-day basic trauma course, aimed at teaching basic extremity fracture care and enhancing collaboration. Data on demographics, pre- and post-course knowledge, changes in daily practice, and perspectives were collected through tests and interviews.

Results

Fifteen FHWs and three TBSs participated in the training. Test results revealed a significant average increase in knowledge, from 79.1% pre-course to 86.5% directly post-course, which was maintained at 89.2% after 1 year post-course. In the interviews, most FHWs and TBSs noted changes in daily fracture care practice, the establishment of mutual understanding and respect, and supported expansion of the training course.

Conclusions

The results support the notion that merged training of FHWs and TBSs can improve fracture care-related knowledge of trainees. Wide support was observed for increased collaboration between FHWs and TBSs, indicating that this type of training is feasible and could be expanded into more extensive, formalized programs. Future programs could benefit from performing follow-up practical examination for objective verification of practice changes, referral monitoring and larger sample sizes.

Clinical relevance

Involvement of TBSs in orthopaedic trauma courses for FHWs could enhance training effectiveness and intersectoral collaboration in LMICs.

Binnerts, J.J., Hendriks, T.C.C., Hussein, S., Bempong-Ahun, N., Ibbotson, G.C., Harrison, W.J., Martin, C., Ranganathan, K., Ehsan, A.N., Chirangi, B.M., Edwards, M.J.R. and Hermans, E. https://doi.org/10.1002/wjs.12503

Abstract

Background
Bone fractures in low- and middle-income countries are commonly managed by traditional bonesetters (TBSs). Past studies emphasize the potential for improved fracture care through intersectoral cooperation. This review gauged support among stakeholders for intersectoral collaboration and the results of previous initiatives.

Methods
Five medical databases were reviewed. Studies focusing on stakeholder perspectives and articles detailing collaborative initiatives were included. Data extraction and synthesis were carried out using the Cochrane Consumers and Communication Review Group’s template. Additionally, all studies underwent quality assessment.

Results
Of the 3821 identified articles, 16 were included after full-text screening. Twelve articles presented stakeholder perspectives, whereas four discussed collaborative initiatives. The overall article quality was low: articles on stakeholder perspectives scored on average 1.42 out of 4 points, whereas articles on collaborative initiatives scored a mean 1.25 points. In total, 62% of stakeholders (75% of TBSs, 92% of hospital staff, and 52% of patients) expressed support for intersectoral collaboration. The ratio between stakeholders expressing support versus those opposing was 4.4:1. No articles presented data on governmental perspectives. The most mentioned collaborative forms were TBS training (24% of stakeholders) and an integrative model (16% of stakeholders). Interventional studies all consisted of TBS training, reporting improved clinical outcomes and increased practice integration.

Conclusion
Despite the limited and low-quality evidence on collaboration initiatives and perspectives, most stakeholders seem supportive of intersectoral collaboration, with training and integration being commonly suggested. Future research efforts exploring the feasibility of embedding TBSs into current primary care systems should ensure the involvement of local and national government.

Binnerts, J.J., Hendriks, T.C.C., Okoth, J., Gill-Wiehl, A., Ranganathan, K., Ehsan, A.N., Harun, N.W., Ogoya, S., Bempong-Ahun, N., Ibbotson, G., Harrison, W.J., Martin, C., Jr., Edwards, M.J.R., Hermans, E. and Chirangi, B.M. https://doi.org/10.1002/wjs.12540

Abstract

Background
Limited research exists on the burden of extremity fractures in Sub-Saharan Africa. Underreporting is likely, as patients often seek out traditional bonesetters (TBSs). This study aims to determine the annual incidence and impact of extremity fractures, alongside health-seeking behavior of patients in rural Tanzania.

Methods
We conducted a cross-sectional household survey in Rorya district, Tanzania, enrolling 497 households with 2667 members, using spatial random sampling. We surveyed household heads regarding access to fracture care and fracture occurrence among household members. We then randomly selected up to three members per household to survey, using the 1448 responses to calculate extremity fracture incidence. Any (self-)reported fractures were questioned on healthcare-seeking behavior and assessed through radiological evaluation. Confirmed cases completed a survey on disability and financial impact.

Results
We radiologically confirmed 11 extremity fractures among 1448 randomly selected respondents, yielding an annual incidence of 0.76%. Five additional fractures were identified among nonrandomized individuals totaling 16 confirmed cases. TBS attendance among patients suspecting fracture was significantly higher than hospital attendance (95% vs. 32%, p < 0.0005). Primary reasons for choosing TBSs were lower cost (62%) and perceived faster healing (29%). Sixty-two percent of patients reported reduced work capacity or requiring help with transport and 50% experienced a decrease in income.

Conclusions
The annual incidence of extremity fractures in this study was 0.76%. TBSs were largely preferred over hospitals due to lower cost and perceived faster healing. Over half of patients experienced reduced ability to work and income loss. Improved communication between TBSs and hospitals, along with better access to hospital care, could reduce complications.

Binnerts J.J., Hendriks T.C.C., Buzugbe N., et al. doi:10.1177/00469580251325031

Abstract

Extremity fractures are increasingly common in Sub-Saharan Africa. In many resource-limited settings, patients with fractures have historically sought out traditional bonesetters (TBSs) and continue to do so, in part due to the undercapacity of existing orthopedic facilities. This qualitative study investigates key stakeholder perspectives on intersectoral collaboration between the formal healthcare system and TBSs in treating extremity fractures in the Rorya district, Tanzania. We combined focus group discussions and semi-structured interviews with four key stakeholder groups: patients with previous fractures, TBSs, hospital staff, and local government representatives. Questions concerned stakeholder experience, advantages of TBS and hospital care, perspectives on collaboration, and potential facilitators and/or barriers. Transcripts were analyzed using thematic analysis and inductive coding. Between June 2022 and August 2023, 35 TBSs, 9 patients with previous fractures, 5 hospital staff members, and 2 government representatives were interviewed. Participants unanimously recognized the need for collaboration between TBSs and hospitals. 

Identified barriers included TBSs’ motivation for hospital referral, poor customer care at hospitals, and limited understanding of fracture management in hospitals by TBSs and patients. Implementation of a collaborative triage and referral system was most commonly suggested. This study summarized all relevant perspectives on intersectoral collaboration. A combined approach of a joint triage and referral system, augmented by community education and TBS training, may enhance the quality and accessibility of fracture care and potentially serve as a model for regions facing similar challenges. Further research is needed to evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of such initiatives in practice.

von Salmuth V., Buijs L., Chirangi B., Vreugdenhil A.C., van Schayck O.C. doi: 10.1017/S1368980023001568
 

Abstract

Objective
The aim of this study is to explore nutrition-related health needs, the perceptions and beliefs regarding the double burden of malnutrition, as well as barriers and facilitators in accessing nutritious food among the local population in rural Tanzania.

Design
A qualitative study design using semi-structured individual interviews and focus-group discussions (FGD) was used. Basic socio-demographic information was obtained from all participants.

Setting
The study was conducted in four villages within the catchment area of the Shirati KMT Hospital in Rorya district, in north-western Tanzania.

Participants
Men and women in the reproductive age as well as Community Health Workers (CHW) were included.

Results
In total, we performed fourteen interviews (N 41), consisting of four FGD, one dual and nine individual interviews. The three most significant topics that were identified are the large knowledge gap concerning overweight and obesity as a health problem, changing weather patterns and its implications on food supply and the socio-cultural drivers including gender roles and household dynamics.

Conclusion
Environmental and socio-cultural factors play a crucial role in the determinants for DBM, which underlines the importance of understanding the local context and the nutrition practices and beliefs of the communities. Future nutritional interventions should aim towards more inclusion of men in project implementation as well as support of women empowerment. CHW could play a key role in facilitating some of the suggested interventions, including nutritional counselling and increasing awareness on the drivers of the double burden of malnutrition.